<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Caffeinated Simpleton - Latest Comments in The New GOP</title><link>http://caffinatedsimpleton.disqus.com/</link><description>My personal blog</description><atom:link href="https://caffinatedsimpleton.disqus.com/the_new_gop/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:57:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The New GOP</title><link>https://justin.harmonize.fm/politics/2009/06/20/the-new-gop.html#comment-12726160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the mention. The article itself shows that you put a great deal of care into your work, &lt;a href="http://www.certyourself.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.certyourself.com"&gt;certification&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; I do agree with all the points you mention but the best is lets see, who will be that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marklee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:57:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New GOP</title><link>https://justin.harmonize.fm/politics/2009/06/20/the-new-gop.html#comment-11534356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think they need to publicly cut ties with the religious right; I think the religious right should still be a part of the party. However, their rhetoric should be removed from the platform. I don't see it happening as a public decision, more of an increasing number of viable candidates simply not using the language.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:21:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New GOP</title><link>https://justin.harmonize.fm/politics/2009/06/20/the-new-gop.html#comment-11530919</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd love to see these things happen, and some of them might happen.  But I cannot see the GOP anytime in the near future separating itself from the religious right.  It's such an organized, united, huge group of supporters that financially it might not make sense for them to cut ties publicly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Paola</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:43:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New GOP</title><link>https://justin.harmonize.fm/politics/2009/06/20/the-new-gop.html#comment-11525152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. There's no way the party remakes itself to the point it can beat&lt;br&gt;Obama in 4 years. The only hope is if Obama screws up, and, personally, I&lt;br&gt;really don't want that to happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New GOP</title><link>https://justin.harmonize.fm/politics/2009/06/20/the-new-gop.html#comment-11524552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is spot-on, but I think Republicans are going to have to lose at least one more presidential election before really getting this lesson into their heads.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Austin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:47:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>